Engineering

The Advanced Product Quality Planning (APQP) 3rd Edition, released by AIAG in March 2024, marks a significant evolution in quality management for the automotive industry. With a strong focus on risk mitigation, supplier evaluation, and process optimization, these updates align with modern manufacturing challenges and Industry 4.0 advancements. But what do these changes mean for

In today’s hyper-competitive manufacturing environment, achieving Zero Defects is no longer just an ideological goal—it is a fundamental requirement for companies striving for long-term success. Delivering consistently flawless products ensures customer satisfaction and positions businesses to thrive amidst evolving market demands. A robust approach to achieving this is integrating Process Flow, FMEA (Failure Mode and

Integrating Quality Control (QC) tools into the digital transformation landscape is not just a passing trend; it represents a fundamental shift redefining the future of manufacturing. As we enter Industry 4.0, the convergence of AI, IoT, and advanced robotics is revolutionizing traditional manufacturing processes. These digital tools are no longer optional; they have become critical

What is the “Voice of the Customer”? Are they looking for something specific? What are they trying to manufacture? What kind of supplier are they interested in working with? All these questions plague the minds of the product development teams within the supply chain industry. According to the new AIAG-created APQP Manual (3rd Ed), the

The Automotive Industry Action Group (AIAG) has recently released the third edition of its Advanced Product Quality Planning (APQP) guidelines, marking a significant update after nearly 15 years. The previous edition was published back in 2008. In this latest iteration, AIAG has introduced several crucial changes to enhance product development processes and ensure quality across

Since the COVID-19 pandemic, manufacturers have suffered from a lack of competent engineering resources. Those that have good engineers often have them doing redundant paperwork fighting fires instead of engaging in proactive APQP activities to ensure good launches and continuous improvement projects. The fight to attract engineering resources will continue in the future. In the